GPU spend has no owner
Training and serving costs are one line on the cloud bill and nobody can attribute them.
Home / Industries / Technology & AI
Technology & AI
For AI-native companies: training and serving infrastructure, evaluation harnesses, data pipelines and the security posture your enterprise customers will demand.
If none of these sound like you, we are probably not the right call yet — and we will say so.
Training and serving costs are one line on the cloud bill and nobody can attribute them.
There is no regression suite, so every new checkpoint is shipped on vibes and reverted on complaints.
SOC 2, data residency, tenant isolation — all solvable, all currently blocking a contract.
Your model is the product. The pipelines, the serving tier, the eval harness and the security posture are what let you sell it to someone serious.
Serving infrastructure that scales down.
Autoscaling, batching and caching, so idle capacity is not the biggest line on the bill.
Evaluation you can ship against.
A regression suite for model behaviour, so upgrades are measured rather than hoped for.
Cost attributed per customer.
Know what each tenant, feature and experiment actually costs to run.
Enterprise-ready from the start.
Isolation, logging and residency designed in, not retrofitted during a procurement cycle.
Different teams, different first project. The platform underneath is the same.
Serving, evaluation and the reliability layer around your model.
Training clusters, data pipelines and experiment infrastructure.
The architecture and evidence enterprise procurement asks for.
An honest read on what to build, what to buy and what to delay.
Four things, in this order. Each one is useful on its own.
GPU clusters, scheduling, autoscaling and the observability around them.
Behavioural regression tests wired into CI, so a model change is a reviewable diff.
Ingestion, labelling workflows, versioning and lineage for training data.
Tenant isolation, audit logging, residency options and the documentation pack.
No surprises about sequence, and no invoice before there is something to look at.
Two weeks inside your stack. We come back with the three things limiting scale.
Usually serving cost, eval coverage or data pipeline reliability. We fix the one that is binding.
Isolation, logging and residency work, mapped to the deals you are trying to close.
We operate the platform under SLA, or hand it to your team with the runbooks.
The questions we work through before recommending anything — data readiness, hosting constraints, review process and the running cost at year two. Use it with any vendor.
Short answers. Longer ones are a conversation.
Usually depth in one area they have not had time for — serving economics, evaluation infrastructure or the enterprise security work. We work alongside your team, not instead of it, and we are explicit about where we are not needed.
Yes, and we will also tell you when not to. Migration makes sense at certain sustained utilisation levels and is a distraction below them. We model your actual usage before recommending a direction.
Both, though most engagements are weighted toward infrastructure and evaluation. If the modelling work is your core differentiation, you should keep it in-house and we will build around it.
Fixed-scope for discovery and defined builds, monthly retainer for managed infrastructure. Both quoted before work starts.
Cost, reliability or a procurement blocker. Tell us which and we will tell you how we would attack it.